The More People I Meet, The More I Like My Cat

XKCD

Posted by: Ace on: February 1, 2010

Sociability and Aspergers

Posted by: Ace on: February 1, 2010

Finally! It is found! I wrote this back in August, but I was busy, and then I lost it before I could post it.

The ‘loner’ stereotype and the sensory oversensitivity/companionship paradox: being unable to stand the presence of others but craving their company.

If you were to ask someone I went to school with, someone with whom I was reasonably well-acquainted with but not close to about my level of sociability, they probably would have described me as ‘not a people person’ or ‘not particularly social’  or even as ‘antisocial.’ I was unfailingly kind and polite to others – that I was never mean to, or about, other people was the one thing besides being ‘quiet,’ that I was well-known for – but I spent every lunch break by myself on the computer and generally evaded invitations to join groups of classmates at lunch.

When I hear the word ‘antisocial’, I think of someone who doesn’t like others, who is irritated by their presence, who would prefer mostly to be alone and does not enjoy company -  in other words,  someone who is not merely uninterested in, but actively dislikes social interaction. It has always surprised me when this label is applied to me, because I hold friendly feelings towards other people generally, and in my mind am a moderately social person.  The problem is, I can’t live up to that.

Despite the fact that most of the Asperger people I have known are somewhat lonely, they tend to keep to themselves and don’t seek out company. Some of them simply do not know how to go about it, or where to start. Some do not realise that it is up to them to befriend others, leaving the initiative to other people.

Then again some are so unsure that they don’t dare try to befriend others, in case they mess it up or do something wrong. Other Asperger people simply do not bother anymore; they have been rebuffed, rejected, excluded or tormented so many times that they no longer try to connect with other people, preferring to avoid opening themselves up to such painful, seemingly-inevitable experiences. It is a sad fact that this can start very early in life; even at a very young age, children can sense differences in others, and can be incredibly cruel. By seven years of age, I was such a social outcast because of my social deficits that I was suicidal, and used to wish that I simply failed to wake up one morning in order to escape the daily torments. While things are not always so extreme as to drive an Asperger person to quite this level of desperation, being an outsider is nonetheless the norm. (“You say loner, I say outcast,” proclaims Lastcrazyhorn.) 

Once an Asperger person has reached the point where they simply no longer make an effort any more, it can be difficult to persuade them to do so even when there is a valid opportunity to build a friendship.

Other Asperger people never give up their search for acceptance, but more often than not those people are simply rejected over and over again in one way or another. More than in any other case, they are not avoiding positive social contact by choice; they simply cannot find anyone willing to be friends with them. It is extraordinarily painful to confront the fact that no one feels that you are worth being friends with, that you have so few redeeming qualities that others reject your initial overtures; that whatever excellent qualities you possess – intelligence, loyalty, a sense of humour, kindness, etc – none of it is enough to make up for your social ineptness.  It is no wonder so many give up and withdraw into themselves, abandoning friendship as a lost cause. Even those with initial success may find that friendships founder when they reach deeper levels of intimacy, and their lack of social understanding betrays them despite their good intentions.

On a closely related note, one of the worst things that can happen to a lonely Asperger person , in my opinion, is to be branded a ‘loner.’ Too often people simply assume that the Asperger person prefers solitude and thus do not attempt to invite them into the social milieu.

Well do I remember, even now, the pain of a particular incident when I was about twelve. Utterly alone at that point, I was delighted when a new student joined my grade.  (It had only nineteen people as a lot of the students joined the big private school at ten years old; my grade was small enough that we were put together with the grade below for class. Everyone knew everyone else and was involved in every conflict or intrigue; things tended to ferment, socially speaking.)  I made plans to do my best to get the new girl on side since she wouldn’t hold any initial prejudices against me. Finally I could have a friend! I was filled with happiness when I overheard her express an interest in getting to know me to several of the other students. Unfortunately one of my classmates airily replied, “Oh, don’t bother, she doesn’t want friends. She’s a loner.” I was, of course, crushed. Subsequent overture were not taken up, the new girl believing that I had no interest in being friends with her. While my classmates often behaved cruelly, there was no malice involved that day: they simply, genuinely believed that I had no desire for friendshio. That hurt as badly as losing the new girl’s potential friendship did.

Teachers are just as likely to make this  ’loner’ assumption as a student. I attended high school for five years, during which time the learning support coordinator worked closely with me regarding several ongoing issues. Upon my graduation my mother expressed the fact that my one real regret, now that I was leaving, was my lack of friends. The learning support coordinator responded with surprise; after all, I had been offered the hand of friendship numerous times, so she had simply assumed that I had no interest in becoming friends with anyone.

On being informed of this conversation, I was absolutely devastated. The fact that someone who knew me as well as this woman did, and who was as educated in Aspergers Syndrome as she was, could mistake my obliviousness of social overtures and inability to respond appropriately to them, and my need for ‘time out’ from the rigours of class in a quiet relaxing environment during the lunch break, for a simple lack of interest in friendship said terrible things about anyone else being likely to realise that I craved companionship.

Which brings me to the third point of discussion of this post: the sensory oversensitivity/companionship paradox. I have always been enormously oversensitive to stimuli,  in a way that is near-impossible to describe. I cannot stand thigns that are too bright, or too loud, or that feel wrong or sound horrible. Much sensation is overpowering. As a child I could not stand hugs; it felt almost painful. People learned not to tickle me: I would scream, and kick and hit and bite, lashing out instinctively. The sensation of being tickled was so unbearable it was akin to great pain.

These days it is not obvious to most how much stress my surroundings put on me. As I write this, I am seated in a university library. There is no talking. No loud noise. By normal standards, it is amazingly quiet. Yet I hear every tap of a keyboard key, every click of a pen or rasp of paper, as tohugh it is next to my ear. I am aware of the sound of the air-conditioning system, the creak of a chair, a long exhalation. I hear someone open their bag, or zip something closed. I hear soft footfalls o nthe carpeted floor. At the same time, I am acutely aware of the brightness of the unnatural flourescent lights, and the way they flicker constantly, distressingly, almost too fast to percieve. The smooth feel of the desk against my arms, the pull of my hair tie holding my hair in place – even the feel of the oil naturally produced by my skin being pressed against the skin by the nose pads on my glasses.

I am acutely aware of everything. And this is in one of the most unstimulating, quietest environments I have known. The mere presence of other people- the sounds and scents of them, their presence in my personal space – can be awful. It is stressful to be around people without even interacting with them.

Interacting with them on top of that? Much worse. I don’t follow something as simply as a conversation intuitively, as most people do. Every social interaction is like a game of chess: is it their turn to speak yet? Is it mine? What are they feeling? How should I reply to what they said? Should I respond to their tone of voice and body language or their words?Is there subtext going on?  (I talk a little about the difficulties of subtext in this post.) Is my body language appropriate to the content and emotional tone of this conversation?   And so on. Every little judgement needs to be analysed before beign made, and that’s just a basic ‘hi, how are you going?’ kind of scenario. It’s exhausting. By lunch break every day when I was still in school, I would be on the edge of collapse from the combination of sensory stimulation and navigating even simple social exchanges that occurred during class time. I couldn’t possibly face heavy-duty social analysis at lunch. Thus, I missed the predominant opportunity for social bonding and the forming of friendships.

Just because an Asperger person keeps to themselves does not mean that they do not want friends or social interactions, and it is important for people dealing with Asperger people to understand that.

Being unable to make friends because of being shunned is an entirely different issue that I mention only briefly here; right now I have stuck more or less to the fallacy of the loner stereotype and understanding what is behind it.

I must ask the universe:

Posted by: Ace on: December 8, 2009

What ever happened to Xine’s Tree?

Vampires?

Posted by: Ace on: November 25, 2009

So I was flipping through a magazine today and they had a page of photos of Twilight-themed goods available to buy online. One of these was a wall transfer that said:

It wasn't quite the same as this particular decoration, as it was in gothic script and had the '...' after 'Edward,' but this one is close enough.

 Yep. “I’m just a Bella, waiting for my Edward…Oh how I lolled.

So I got to thinking about Twilight, which led to thought on vampires in general, and then I came across a general vampire meme, and I thought: I need to blog about this. So here we go, Ace’s Vampire Meme.

Ace’s Vampire Meme!

Why do you think people are fascinated by vampires?

The thing about vampires is that they appeal to our subconscious. People often associate vampire with death, or with sex, but it’s more than that. Vampires are dead, powerful, faster and stronger than us, dangerous, and often gorgeous and alluring.  They appeal to people because they’re like we are, only better. They’re also the perfect predator. Vampires represent the mysterious, the erotic, the dangerous. They’re all about the repressed or the darker side of our psyche. They’re dangerous, alluring, sexually desirable and aware, near-invulnerable, and they can do anything they like without fear of the consequences. They appeal to us because they are an outlet for all the things in our subconscious that we cannot let out.  In the past 15-20 years there’s been a lot of tortured-soul vampire stuff; from Angel in Buffy or Edward Cullen from Twilight to name the two most well-known examples; and that’s another aspect that appeals to people. Lots of people have some dark secret, some dilemma or addiction that is mucking up their life, and that’s what the ‘vampire as a tortured soul’ stuff really is. It’s a metaphor. So much vampire stuff is a metaphor for something.

 Coolest vampire stuff out there?

Well, obviously Buffy has to be on this list, which in a way is kind of a shame, because it deviates quite a bit from the established vampire mythos of pop culture. Vampires as soulless, ugly demons? Who steal their names from Doctor Who and look like Dark Lords from Harry Potter, only less cool? (You don’t know what I’m talking about, check out this guy. Totally Voldemort with a nose. And with no fashion sense, obviously.) All the same, Buffy is nonetheless a good show and doubtless reinvigorated the vampire mythos for a new decade and a new generation.

My personal favorite part of the vampire pop culture is the Betsy Taylor series of novels by MaryJanice Davidson, about a blonde valleygirl-type airhead who dies and wakes up Queen of the Vampires, much to her horror and dismay. The earlier ones are strongly comic supernatural romance, but the later ones are a lot stronger on plot and a little bit darker as Betsy reluctantly takes on the responsibility of being the Queen.

Finally, Carpe Jugulum (‘Seize the Jugular?’) by Terry Pratchett is awesome, for parodying the vampire genre even as it tells a great story. 

 Since everyone is asking this question; Team Edward or Team Jacob?

*frowny face* Honestly, I don’t particularly like either of them. Let’s go Team Alice. She’s bouncy and fun and slightly eccentric, and the actress who plays her in the movie is pretty, and hot.

Favorite vampire stereotype?

The true predatorial vampires, that is the dangerous killers vs. seducer type, probably, and the ‘Gothic Lolita’ female vampire you see a lot in manga; that is, flirty and feminine and kind of goth, but with frills and lace and cuteness. If they’ve combined gothic vampire dress with cute feminine dress and hairstyle, it’s probably a ’Gothic Lolita’ vampire.

'gothic lolita' vampire

A sketch of a 'Gothic Lolita' vampire... is it just me, or does she look vaguely like Britney Spears?

Twitter updates

Posted by: Ace on: November 20, 2009

Currently in the life of Ace…

14:51 I think I mighta mispelled my username… I did it from memory…

14:51 It means ‘Ace is in the house.’

14:52 @neilhimself Reading Maddy’s posts on your account was hilarious

14:53 Question: Is crime scene forensics a bad subject to do if you have an acute sense of smell? Discuss.

14:57 "Does somebody want to tell me why a hotel guest is serving customers? I warned you we’d be busy with that sissy writer thing in town!" LOL!

14:58 Thank you MaryjaniceDavidson for that quote. :) [maryjanicedavidson.blogspot.com/2009/10/i-carve-for-elderly.html]

15:11 Came across "Twitterature" [mashable.com/2009/06/23/twitterature/] today.It’s a set of classic books in 20 tweets or less.Oddly funny

15:12 @neilhimself hey, found "Twitterature" today.It’s a set of classic books in 20 tweets or less mashable.com/2009/06/23/twitterature/

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Check this out

Posted by: Ace on: November 20, 2009

I’m a pretty big fan of author MaryJanice Davidson. She writes hilarious, engaging stories in the supernatural genre about, among other things, a reluctant valleygirl-turned-vampire-queen that I love half to death. She has a blog, on writing and on Real Life, which I check out every now and then. (My life, it is inexplicably busy.)

Anyway, I came across this post, on what can happen when your hotel staff are busy. It’s hysterical. You should read it.

What subjects?

Posted by: Ace on: November 20, 2009

I’m thinking about doing the unit on crime scene forensics next semester. (In America that stuff is done by forensic anthropologists, but out here it’s archaeologists who do the forensic work.) It’s definitely one I’d like to do. I’ve always found that sort of thing really interesting. I haven’t done the base level practical unit for this course yet though, and I’m wondering how necessary it is. Is it vital? I have a lowering suspicion that it is. Also, I have a very acute sense of smell. It’s not as sensitive as it was when I was a child – I used to be able to smell ants, for example; apparently it’s the formic acid; they stink, by the way – but on the other hand it’s far more discerning. In the past I’ve been able to walk into a room and tell that someone has injured themselves by the faint smell of blood. Needless to say, I’m not entirely sure that working, in any capacity, within the vicinity of dead people is the best idea… I’d like to find out, though.

I don’t have to make a decision until February, but still, it’s bugging me.

I do know however, that I will be studying Latin. I’ve already got the texts and did some of the exercises on the way home on the train the other day. As I suspected, Latin is fun. Also, nice and logical.

Not Everything End in Ashes

Posted by: Ace on: November 19, 2009

So a year and several months ago, after difficulty after difficulty, I had to to go through a rather unpleasant process which ended with my writing this distraught post. Everything in it was honestly true at the time.

The thing is, when you admit something, to yourself and to others, you finally get a chance to look at it clearly. And when you’re not trying to walk around the elephant in the room like it’s not there, and not trying to constantly cover up and do things you are hopelessly incapable of, you find, all of a sudden, that you are doing things at your level, and you can do them.

And you think.

Sometimes, you can come to conclusions that you might have come to years ago if only you hadn’t been so busy denying parts of yourself.

July this year I made a sudden leap. I did what I’d always wanted to do, and enrolled in archaeology via a BA.  My grade 12 score was good, and there were vacant places in the course, so I was mildly surprised to end up taking classes at the best university in the state within two weeks of deciding to go for it. Surprised, but very pleased.

I’ve been working like crazy, but it has paid off. My mind has been switched on like a lightbulb, for the first time in years. I love what I’m doing. And best of all, I’m succeeding. I thought I didn’t have a chance at anything, but I found that when I’m dedicated, I can do things. Sure I’m only doing it part-time, and I’ve been requiring a lot of leeway at home, but I’m doing well! I just finished my last exam, but I have solidly passed one subject, and I went into my final exam knowing that I would pass in that subject no matter how I did in the exam, because of how well I was doing for the subject.

I’m happy. I have a future. I feel great, and I just wanted to share it with everyone who was kind enough to console me after I wrote last year’s post. I found something I love and I’m good at, and apparently when something meets those criteria, I can do it.

Five things I like and dislike about technology meme

Posted by: Ace on: November 19, 2009

I got this idea from Belle de Jour’s blog. It seemed cool enough, so yeah. The meme evolves into a new form. (She still uses Blogspot, bless her. I left that one half a decade ago. WordPress is way more awesome. *totally unnecessary plug*)

I can’t believe I’m going to try to limit it to five things I like, since I am a Certified Geek Girl (I object to the term ‘chick,’ for philosophical reasons) and have a peculiar affinity to tech. Anyway:

 

Five things I dislike about technology:

  • LISP dialect: Scheme. Programming language from hell, aka the Final Straw That Finally Made Me Quit Trying To Study I.T. as a Career. (Computers are fun as a hobby, but not as a life choice.)  Oh, how I hate it. It’s a monster. More specific, language-based languages like Basic are okay, but Scheme? It’s over thirty years old, and it is nothing like the current languages. Sure, it’s dynamic and easy to use if you can grasp it, and no one wants a repeat of some of the Y2K problems, but it’s a horrendous thing to inflict on a first year IT student. The class had a 70-80% fail rate. I’ve more or less quit ranting about it by now – it’s been, like, four years – but I still hate it passionately.
  • The fact that on the web, nothing is private and nobody is truly anonymous. If you’re skilled enough, you can grab important, basic details about people and use them against them. It’s not especially hard. I find that scary, and it’s only going to get worse.
  • There’s so much junk clogging the net and obscuring the awesome stuff.
  • The technology is beginning to evolve faster than I am. I used to keep up with its changes effortlessly, but since computer-geekery became a hobby instead of a way of life, I’ve lost a little bit of my instant adaptability. I actually passed up the opportunity to get a new phone to replace my years-old chunky one because I tohught the new ones were a bit fussy. (Of course, that decision lasted only until I saw the Sony Walkman phone. Instant tech lust.)
  • That the truly awesome stuff costs more money than  have.

 

Five things I like about technology:

  • The internet. My life would be an empty, sad shell without the internet. I use it to connect with people, and I use it constantly to learn. I am on a never-ending quest to learn new things, and the internet’s like the never ending bag of Unexpected Awesomeness. You get a lot of unexpected totally-uncoolness, but hey, you gotta take the bad with the good.
  • My mp3 player. Music I can take with me! And it’s so easy to use, and to carry around!
  • Lego Batman, Star Wars:Racer and Sonic the Hedgehog. Because they rock the casbah.
  • It makes life more complicated, but also more interesting. I read a thing by a scientist where he asserted that through the constant pressure to adapt to new technologies that we are putting ourselves through, we are actually putting great evolutionary pressure upon ourselves and are forcing ourselves to evolve more quickly. I don’t know if it’s true, but it helps life stop getting stale and unchanging.
  • Man, does it help with uni work! I can just download lecture notes, enroll online, spare my lecturers my infamous handwriting…

Embarrassment, Self-Consciousness, and Theory of Mind

Posted by: Ace on: November 19, 2009

Note: So I’ve been hopelessly busy, but a few months back I wrote this smashing article called Sociability and Aspergers discussing, among other things, the damage the ‘loner’ stereotype can cause. Wouldn’t you know, I finally have time to type it up, and I can’t find it. So in the meantime, check this one out.


Embarrassment, Self-Consciousness, and Theory of Mind:

What they have to do with one another and how this relates to Aspergers, as well as why it’s important.

I never blushed until I was almost eighteen.

I used to feel very complacent about the fact that I never blushed when I was embarrassed. So you can imagine my horror when all of a sudden, I began to blush fierily. A poker face is no good if it’s a bright red one.  I wondered for a long time why I began blushing so late in life, until it dawned on me: I still never blush when I’m embarrassed. I blush when I feel decidedly self-conscious.

Read about autism or Aspergers at all, and you will soon come across what is referred to as Theory of Mind. It’s usually explained in very simplistic terms as the understanding that other people are separate from you, and have thoughts and feelings of their own. The problem with this explanation is that it is very basic; theory of mind is more complex than that. Asperger people often have diminished theory of mind; it is not a matter of whether they do or don’ t have it, but to what degree. It is compatarively easy tro grasp that another person has thoughts and feelings separate from yours, but the more complex aspects – the ‘put yourself in their shoes’ and work out what they might be feeling part – is much harder.

More on that later.

So where do embarrassment and self-consciousness come into this?

To my mind, embarrassment is all about you, and realising you’ve made a fool of yourself, but self-consciousness is an awareness that other people are monitoring you and making judgements about you, and an awareness of the kind of judgements they might be making.

A rather illustrative example of low self-consciousness occurs in an episode of Doctor Who. (Bear with me here.) The Doctor and Rose, while investigating alien activity, go into a stranger’s house to ask them  questions about strange incidents occurring in the area. The Doctor notices a jar of jam on a table top, and promptly scoops some of the jam out of the jar using his fingers, while Rose watches appalled. He is not censoring his actions out of awareness that he is being watched and judged he is cheerfully oblivious.

Everyone is naturally self-conscious to one degree or another; it is only when we are acutely so that it becomes a problem. To be self-conscious to a normal degree however, you need to have a fairly complex theory of mind. Thus, it was only when I had finished school and began interacting more broadly with people that I developed my inclination to blush, because until then my natural level of self-consciousness was much lower.

I feel that it is important for people to understand this effect of diminished theory of mind, because it affects social interactions. If you do not understand how people judge your actions or why, or how they react to your percieved intent, then you may behave in an eccentric or offensive way without even realising it. This more subtle aspect of Aspergers often escapes people and exacerbates difficulties particularly in social situations, because people operate under a certain set of assumptions regarding another’s theory of mind – that they understand how their actions are viewed and recieved by others, etc. It is especially important for carers to understand this, as they may need to explain why it is so important to brush your hair every morning or  can’t burst into song in a public place, for example, or why fashion sense is important. It is also important for an Aspergers person’s friends to understand this, so that they realise that their Asperger friend does not necessarily mean offence, and if they accidentally offend them to explain what they did wrong. (Because you know, the ‘what did I do??’  ‘Oh, like you don’t know! conversation is one of the most frustrating ones in existence. Seriously people, if we had a clue, we wouldn’t be asking.)

Hope this helps people.